Which of the following is NOT a potential penalty for non-compliance with asbestos regulations?

The correct choice highlights an important aspect of enforcement in asbestos regulation. While sanctions can vary, incarceration of company executives is not a typical penalty directly associated with non-compliance with asbestos regulations. Regulations primarily focus on financial penalties, compliance orders, and license suspensions as methods for holding companies accountable.

Fines imposed by regulators act as a financial deterrent to mitigate risks associated with asbestos exposure, protecting both workers and the public. Suspension of business licenses can prevent a company from operating until they comply with safety regulations, emphasizing the importance of following asbestos management protocols.

Increased insurance premiums can also be a consequence of non-compliance. Insurers may raise rates for companies with a track record of regulatory violations, reflecting the higher risk associated with businesses that fail to manage asbestos safely.

Understanding the nature of penalties helps clarify the regulatory framework surrounding asbestos management and the priorities established to encourage compliance and promote safety.